Celebrity privacy has always been a controversial topic in
itself. Some say that if you choose to become a celebrity then you are choosing
to share all aspects of your life to the world. On the other hand, some say
that everyone is entitled to privacy despite being a celebrity. The ‘real world’
and the ‘celebrity world’ seem to have different views when it comes to this
topic and even though we are all humans, the right to invade someone’s privacy
seems to be less concerning when it comes to famous people.
The private lives of celebrities are spread all over the
media whether consent is given or not. It is part of the entertainment,
especially when that certain celebrity has done something negative and did not
want the public to know about it. To regular people, not only is it
entertaining but arguably it makes celebrities more relatable. It separates
them from being the picture perfect individual they are made out to be to a
human who makes mistakes. The invasion is also enjoyed when that particular
celebrity is not necessarily liked therefore when they are exposed; it is
favoured by a lot of the public.
Deciding whether it is right or wrong is down to the
individual and their views on privacy. Most recent pictures of Kate Middleton’s
baby bump being exposed whilst on holiday with Prince William surfaced. She was
wearing a bikini, exposing her stomach. They were vacationing on the island of
Mustique in the Caribbean where pictures were snapped of the royal couple. It
was on a private island meaning that the couple did not want their pictures to
be taken. The violation of their privacy sparked many views on whether it was right
to publish in the Italian magazine, Chi.

So is it bad because everyone is entitled to privacy or is it acceptable because they are in the public eye therefore are immediately liable to privacy invasion?
No comments:
Post a Comment